M. Cilic
Ganar
M. Gigante
Ganar
Matteo Gigante vs Mitchell Krueger Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W W W W
Form
L W W L W L W W L LCara A Cara: Gigante 2 - 0 Krueger
Ellas han jugado 5 conjuntos en total, con Gigante victoriosa 4 y Krueger victoriosa 1. El último partido entre Gigante y Krueger fue en el BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, el 03-03-2025, Cuartos de Q1 round, Hard, con Matteo Gigante obteniendo la victoria 6-4 6-2
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matteo Gigante | 2 |
| Mitchell Krueger | 0 |
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(03-03-2025)
6
4
6
2
| Gigante | Estadísticas | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 195 | Ranking | 150 |
| 132 | Highest Rank | 135 |
| 23 | Age | 31 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 58% (154-110) | Total de Carrera V/D | 53% (433-387) |
| 57% (12-9) | Ganar/Perder | 45% (10-12) |
| $280,090 | Prize Money de Carrera | $1,082,108 |
| 1 | YTD Títulos | 0 |
| 2 | Dura H2H | 0 |
Próxima partido
29 Apr 2025 / First
IMPARES
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
53%
(
65 of
122)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
105)
6
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
0
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
54%
(
31 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
46 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Ganados | 1 |
| 29 | Juegos Ganados | 21 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 12 | Faltas dobles totales | 3 |
| 1:52:38 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:52:38 |
| 57% (97/170) | % De Primer Servicio | 69% (109/158) |
| 70% (68/97) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 66% (72/109) |
| 56% (41/73) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 47% (23/49) |
| 55% (6/11) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 40% (63/158) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 36% (61/170) |
| 100% (2/2) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Matteo Gigante
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Vilius Gaubas
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
67%
(
76 of
113)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(6) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Matteo Gigante
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Pietro Orlando Fellin
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
8
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Mitchell Krueger
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Mitchell Krueger
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
85 of
127)
1st Serve %
66%
(
84 of
127)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
57 of
84)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
46 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
46 of
127)
127
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
91
Total Points Won
104
|
0-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kei Nishikori
Player
Mitchell Krueger
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Zahraj
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-7(5) 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
55
|
5-7 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (154/110) | Win/Loss | 53% (433/387) |
| 56% (348/272) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1023/910) |
| 52% (3047/2788) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (9458/9037) |
| 71% (56/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (271/231) |
| 59% (86/60) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (120/94) |
| 26% (9/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (33/47) |
| 60% (3/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (9/15) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 820 | Aces Total | 2817 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 876 | Total Double Faults | 1653 |
| 1:33:44 | Average Match Time | 1:22:54 |
| 352.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 517.7 |
| 59% (10432/17584) | 1st Serve % | 62% (29225/47389) |
| 68% (7106/10432) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (20207/29225) |
| 49% (3535/7152) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9231/18164) |
| 44% (835/1904) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1780/4311) |
| 41% (7356/17844) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18313/47784) |
| 53% (9/8) | Slam W/L | 47% (27/31) |
| 44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 40% (12/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (2/8) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (36/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (102/75) | Challenger W/L | 49% (231/239) |
| 73% (37/14) | Futures W/L | 67% (127/62) |
| 59% (151/256) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (422/803) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 56% (44/78) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (129/278) |
| 56% (50/90) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (127/284) |
| 80% (160/128) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (442/358) |
| 19% (160/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (442/84) |
| 23% (104/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (378/71) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
